U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2011

United States v. Rice

United States v. Rice
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided October 26, 2011 · Edmondson, Carnes, Kravitch
445 F. App'x 252

United States v. Rice

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Oshani Rice, in this direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation of the appellant, because counsel believes that the appeal is without merit. Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

Our independent review of the record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguably meritorious issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Rice’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.