[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-15752 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar OCTOBER 26, 2011 ________________________ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 8:07-cr-00439-JSM-MAP-3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, llllllllllllllllllll l Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE FREDDY MEDINA-VALENCIA, a.k.a. El Indio, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida ________________________ (October 26, 2011) Before EDMONDSON, CARNES and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: Cynthia Hernandez, appointed counsel for Jose Medina-Valencia, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

Medina-Valencia, in response, has filed a motion seeking permission to proceed in forma pauperis, and to file a pro se brief. Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Medina-Valencia’s conviction and sentence is AFFIRMED.

Medina-Valencia’s motion seeking permission to proceed in forma pauperis, and to file a pro se brief, is DENIED as moot.