U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2011

United States v. Soto

United States v. Soto
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided August 24, 2011 · Hull, Pryor, Black
438 F. App'x 859

United States v. Soto

Opinion

*860 PER CURIAM:

Michael P. Hanle, appointed counsel for Leonel Soto in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issue of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Soto’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.