United States v. Soto

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
United States v. Soto, 438 F. App'x 859 (11th Cir. 2011)

United States v. Soto

Opinion

*860 PER CURIAM:

Michael P. Hanle, appointed counsel for Leonel Soto in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issue of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Soto’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leonel SOTO, A.K.A. Ramadan, A.K.A. Carols Ramirez Soto, Defendant-Appellant
Status
Unpublished