U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2011

United States v. Ian Sean Gordon

United States v. Ian Sean Gordon
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided August 24, 2011 · Hull, Pryor, Fay
438 F. App'x 859

United States v. Ian Sean Gordon

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Paul Shorstein, appointed counsel for Ian Sean Gordon in this direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation of the appellant, because counsel believes that the appeal is without merit. Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

Our independent review of the record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguably meritorious issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Gordon’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.