U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2011

United States v. Michael James Montgomery

United States v. Michael James Montgomery
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided June 1, 2011 · Hull, Martin, Anderson
428 F. App'x 899

United States v. Michael James Montgomery

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Tracy N. DaCruz, appointed counsel for Michael James Montgomery in this 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) proceeding, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s order denying Montgomery a sentence reduction under § 3582(c)(2) is AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.