U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2011

United States v. HO

United States v. HO
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided May 2, 2011

United States v. HO

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 10-13548 MAY 2, 2011 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY CLERK ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:09-cr-00141-CG-M-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DIEP VU HO, a.k.a. Dumbo, a.k.a. Quoc T. Ho, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama ________________________ (May 2, 2011) Before BARKETT, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: Raymond A. Pierson, appointed counsel for Diep Vu Ho in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issue of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Ho’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.