United States v. HO
United States v. HO
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED
________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-13548 MAY 2, 2011
Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY
CLERK
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:09-cr-00141-CG-M-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus DIEP VU HO, a.k.a. Dumbo, a.k.a. Quoc T. Ho,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
________________________
(May 2, 2011) Before BARKETT, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
Raymond A. Pierson, appointed counsel for Diep Vu Ho in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issue of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Ho’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished