United States v. HO

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. HO

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED

________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-13548 MAY 2, 2011

Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY

CLERK

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:09-cr-00141-CG-M-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus DIEP VU HO, a.k.a. Dumbo, a.k.a. Quoc T. Ho,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Alabama

________________________

(May 2, 2011) Before BARKETT, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Raymond A. Pierson, appointed counsel for Diep Vu Ho in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issue of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Ho’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished