United States v. Holmes

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Holmes

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FILED

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUITU.S. COURT OF APPEALS

________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

APR 29, 2011

No. 10-13099 JOHN LEY

Non-Argument Calendar CLERK

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cr-00440-JSM-TGW-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus DELROY HOLMES, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(April 29, 2011) Before BARKETT, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Brent Armstrong, appointed counsel for Delroy Holmes, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Holmes’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished