In Re: Checking Account Overdraft Litigation Doris Powell-Perry, Curnie Sanders v. Branch Banking and Trust Company
In Re: Checking Account Overdraft Litigation Doris Powell-Perry, Curnie Sanders v. Branch Banking and Trust Company
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT APRIL 28, 2011 No. 10-12374 JOHN LEY ________________________ CLERK
D.C. Docket Nos. 1:09-md-02036-JLK, 1:10-cv-20820-JLK
In Re: CHECKING ACCOUNT OVERDRAFT LITIGATION
___________________________________________________
DORIS POWELL-PERRY, Individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated, CURNIE SANDERS,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
versus
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida ________________________ (April 28, 2011) Before PRYOR and COX, Circuit Judges, and WATKINS,* District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
After oral argument in this case, the United States Supreme Court decided
AT&T Mobility LLC v. Conception, No. 09-893, 2011 WL 1561956 (April 27, 2011).
The district court’s order denying the motion to compel arbitration is VACATED, and
this case is remanded to the district court for reconsideration in light of the Supreme
Court’s opinion.
VACATED AND REMANDED.1
* Honorable W. Keith Watkins, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Alabama, sitting by designation. 1 This is an unlimited remand.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished