U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2011

United States v. Stoufflet

United States v. Stoufflet
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided April 22, 2011 · Barkett, Marcus, Anderson
424 F. App'x 881

United States v. Stoufflet

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Mary Erickson, appointed counsel for Christopher Stoufflet in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Stoufflet has filed a pro se motion for the appointment of new counsel. Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, Stoufflet’s motion for the appointment of new counsel is DENIED, and Stoufflet’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.