United States v. Jose Carreno

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Jose Carreno

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-12116 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

APRIL 5, 2011

Non-Argument Calendar

JOHN LEY

________________________

CLERK

D. C. Docket No. 1:09-cr-20545-AJ-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE CARRENO,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

_________________________

(April 5, 2011) Before EDMONDSON, WILSON and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Hector Flores, appointed counsel for Jose Carreno in this direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation of the appellant, because counsel believes that the appeal is without merit. Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

Our independent review of the record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguably meritorious issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Carreno’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished