Maale v. Kirchgessner

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Maale v. Kirchgessner

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 10-13798 MARCH 30, 2011 JOHN LEY ________________________ CLERK

D.C. Docket No. 9:08-cv-80131-WPD

GERHARD EMIL MAALE, III,

llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Counter Defendant - llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Appellant,

versus

CAICOS BEACH CLUB CHARTER, LTD, a foreign company, et al.,

lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendants,

KIM FRANCIS KIRCHGESSNER, RAHL & RAHL, PA, a Florida professional association, PATRICIA RAHL, BRIAN RAHL,

llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Counter-Claimants - llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Appellees. ________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida ________________________

(March 30, 2011)

Before BARKETT, HULL and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Gerhard Emil Maale, III, appeals the district court’s grant of summary

judgment to Defendants Kim Kirchgessner, Brian Rahl, Patricia Rahl, and Rahl &

Rahl, PA, on Maale’s civil R.I.C.O. claims. He argues that the court erred in

concluding that his claims were barred by the four-year statute of limitations for

civil R.I.C.O. claims. We have considered the briefs and oral argument of the

parties and, on this record, find no reversible error in the district court’s order

granting summary judgment to the Defendants.

AFFIRMED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished