United States v. Otis McRay

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Otis McRay

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-14562 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

FEB 22, 2011

Non-Argument Calendar

JOHN LEY

________________________ CLERK

D.C. Docket No. 3:01-cr-00038-HES-TEM-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus OTIS MCRAY,

Defendant-Appellant.

__________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(February 22, 2011) Before BLACK, HULL and WILSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Maurice C. Grant, II, appointed counsel for Otis McRay in this 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) proceeding, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and McRay’s sentence is AFFIRMED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished