Gary W. Nash v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc
Gary W. Nash v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ____________________________U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JANUARY 7, 2011 No. 10-11923 JOHN LEY Non-Argument Calendar CLERK ____________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:07-cv-01779-EAK-TGW
GARY W. NASH, BEVERLY J. NASH, his wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
versus
PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS, INC., DIVINE PROVIDENCE, INC., d/b/a Divine Providence Food Bank/America’s Second Harvest of Tampa Bay, WILLIAM H. MILES,
Defendants-Appellees. ______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida ______________________________
(January 7, 2011)
Before TJOFLAT, WILSON, and HILL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
This is an appeal from the grant of defendants’s/appellees’s, Publix Super
Markets, Inc. (Publix), and Divine Providence, Inc., d/b/a Divine Providence Food
Bank/America’s Second Harvest of Tampa Bay (Divine Providence), motions for
summary judgment against plaintiffs/appellants, Gary W. Nash (Nash) and
Beverly J. Nash, on their claims for malicious prosecution and loss of consortium.
The claims arose from a prior criminal prosecution of Nash by the Office of State
Attorney on a 161-count indictment for grand theft, dealing in stolen property,
organized fraud, conspiracy to commit RICO violation, and RICO violation, of
which, in a non-jury trial, Nash was found not guilty on all counts.
We have reviewed the record in this appeal, the briefs and the arguments of
counsel. Finding no error, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
AFFIRMED.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished