United States v. Susy Figeuroa

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Susy Figeuroa

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED

________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-14731 DECEMBER 15, 2011

Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY

________________________ CLERK

D.C. Docket No. 1:09-cr-20610-JAL-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus SUSY FIGUEROA, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

No. 10-15036

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:09-cr-20610-JAL-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus SIXTO FIGUEROA, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

No. 10-15045

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:09-cr-20610-JAL-5 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MANUEL GARCIA, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

No. 10-15046

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:09-cr-20610-JAL-4

2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ROLANDO HERRERA, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

________________________

(December 15, 2011) Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, MARCUS and MARTIN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Thomas Butler, appointed counsel for Susy Figueroa in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

3 independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Figueroa’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

4

Reference

Status
Unpublished