Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2011

Buffington v. Suntrust Banks, Inc.

Buffington v. Suntrust Banks, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided April 28, 2011
425 F. App'x 830

Counsel

Edward Adam Webb, G. Franklin Le-mond, Jr., Webb, Klase & Lemond, L.L.C., Atlanta, GA, Robert C. Gilbert, Bruce Ro-gow, Alters Law Firm, Miami, FL, for Plaintiffs-Appellees., Lynette Eaddy Smith, Lindsey Bowen, William N. Withrow, Jr., Troutman Sanders, Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Buffington v. Suntrust Banks, Inc.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

After oral argument in this case, the United States Supreme Court decided AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, — U.S.-, 131 S.Ct. 1740, 179 L.Ed.2d 742 (2011). The district court’s order denying the motion to compel arbitration is VACATED, and this case is remanded to the district court for reconsideration in light of the Supreme Court’s opinion.

VACATED AND REMANDED.1

. This is an unlimited remand.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.