U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2011

United States v. James

United States v. James
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided December 7, 2011 · Carnes, Edmondson, Tjoflat
447 F. App'x 990

United States v. James

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Howard Greitzer, appointed counsel for Tim James in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and James’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.