U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2012

United States v. Wilens Bertrand

United States v. Wilens Bertrand
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided September 10, 2012

United States v. Wilens Bertrand

Opinion

Case: 11-14431 Date Filed: 09/10/2012 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 11-14431 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 2:11-cr-14025-KMM-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus WILENS BERTRAND, Defendant-Appellant.

__________________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _________________________ (September 10, 2012) Before BARKETT, PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: Thomas John Bulter, appointed counsel for Wilens Bertrand in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. Case: 11-14431 Date Filed: 09/10/2012 Page: 2 of 2

1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bertrand’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.