[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

No. 11-12332 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

Non-Argument Calendar APRIL 5, 2012

________________________ JOHN LEY

CLERK

D.C. Docket No. 2:10-cr-00141-MHT-WC-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CHAD EDWIN LANGFORD,

llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllDefendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Alabama

________________________

(April 5, 2012) Before MARCUS, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Daniel G. Hamm, appointed counsel for Chad Edwin Langford, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merits of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Langford’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

2