Rhonda Ramirez v. Commissioner of Social Security

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Rhonda Ramirez v. Commissioner of Social Security

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FILED

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

MARCH 27, 2012

No. 11-15128 JOHN LEY

Non-Argument Calendar CLERK

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 8:10-cv-01354-TBM RHONDA RAMIREZ, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(March 27, 2012) Before CARNES, PRYOR and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Rhonda Ramirez appeals the district court’s decision affirming the Commissioner’s denial of her applications for a period of disability, disability insurance benefits, and supplemental security income benefits. She contends that her “borderline intellectual functioning” was inconsistent with the general learning ability levels required for the jobs the vocational expert determined she could do. She did not raise this issue before the district court, however, and we generally will not consider an argument not raised before the district court. See Kelley v. Apfel, 185 F.3d 1211, 1215 (11th Cir. 1999). We decline to do so here.

AFFIRMED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished