U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2012

United States v. Enrique Rico-Vidal

United States v. Enrique Rico-Vidal
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided February 1, 2012

United States v. Enrique Rico-Vidal

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 11-11040 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FEB 1, 2012 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 3:10-cr-00105-MCR-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ENRIQUE RICO-VIDAL, a.k.a. Enrique Vidall, a.k.a. Luis Javier Marrero,

llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida ________________________ (February 1, 2012) Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, MARCUS and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: Gwendolyn Spivey, appointed counsel for Enrique Rico-Vidal in this appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Rico-Vidal’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.