Johnny Ward Putnam v. Bayer A.G.
Johnny Ward Putnam v. Bayer A.G.
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED
________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
APRIL 24, 2012
No. 11-12999
JOHN LEY
________________________
CLERK
D.C. Docket Nos. 1:08-md-01928-DMM,
9:08-cv-81432-DMM JOHNNY WARD PUTNAM, lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll l Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus BAYER A.G., et al., llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendants, BAYER CORPORATION, lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll lDefendant-Appellee.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
________________________
(April 24, 2012) Before HULL and COX, Circuit Judges, and BOWEN,* District Judge.
*
The Honorable Dudley H. Bowen, Jr., United States District Judge for the Southern District of Georgia, sitting by designation. PER CURIAM:
After review and oral argument before this Court, we conclude that Plaintiff- Appellant Johnny Ward Putnam has shown no reversible error in the district court’s order, dated 27 May 2011, granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee Bayer Corporation on all of Putnam’s claims, based on Mississippi’s statutes of limitation.
The district court did not err in finding that, as a matter of law, Putnam failed to show that the relevant Mississippi limitation periods were tolled based on theories of fraudulent concealment and/or discovery of latent injury.
AFFIRMED.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished