Johnny Ward Putnam v. Bayer A.G.
Johnny Ward Putnam v. Bayer A.G.
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT APRIL 24, 2012 No. 11-12999 JOHN LEY ________________________ CLERK D.C. Docket Nos. 1:08-md-01928-DMM, 9:08-cv-81432-DMM JOHNNY WARD PUTNAM, lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll l Plaintiff-Appellant, versus BAYER A.G., et al., llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendants, BAYER CORPORATION, lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll lDefendant-Appellee. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida ________________________ (April 24, 2012) Before HULL and COX, Circuit Judges, and BOWEN,* District Judge.
* The Honorable Dudley H. Bowen, Jr., United States District Judge for the Southern District of Georgia, sitting by designation.
PER CURIAM: After review and oral argument before this Court, we conclude that Plaintiff- Appellant Johnny Ward Putnam has shown no reversible error in the district court’s order, dated 27 May 2011, granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee Bayer Corporation on all of Putnam’s claims, based on Mississippi’s statutes of limitation.
The district court did not err in finding that, as a matter of law, Putnam failed to show that the relevant Mississippi limitation periods were tolled based on theories of fraudulent concealment and/or discovery of latent injury.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.