U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2012

United States v. Michael Burgess

United States v. Michael Burgess
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided June 7, 2012 · Hull, Martin, Hill
471 F. App'x 860

United States v. Michael Burgess

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Sean M. Wagner, counsel for Michael Frank Burgess in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Burgess’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED. Accordingly, Burgess’s motion for leave to file a pro se supplemental brief is DENIED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.