U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2012

Alberto D. Btesh v. City of Maitland, FL

Alberto D. Btesh v. City of Maitland, FL
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided June 13, 2012 · Carnes, Wilson, Hill
471 F. App'x 883

Counsel

Elliot Burt Kula, Daniel M. Samson, Kula & Samson, LLP, Aventura, FL, Stewart Greenberg, Howard Weitzner, Greenberg & Stone, PA, Kevin Patrick O’Connor, Beranton James Whisenant, Jr., Foley & Mansfield, PLLP, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellant., Clifford Bishop Shepard, Kalanit Oded, Dani Samantha Theobald, Shepard, Smith & Cassady, PA, Maitland, FL, for Defendants-Appellees.

Alberto D. Btesh v. City of Maitland, FL

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

*884 PER CURIAM:

Alberto Btesh appeals the grant of summary judgment to the City of Maitland, Rebecca Denicola and Gary Calhoun on all the remaining counts of his complaint in this action.

The district court in an exhaustive 88-page opinion held that neither of the individual defendants violated Btesh’s clearly established constitutional right. As a result, the court held that the City of Maitland also was not liable to Btesh. The court found no merit to any of Btesh’s other claims.

We have read the briefs, reviewed the record and carefully considered the district court’s findings and conclusions of law. Finding no error in these, the judgment of the district court is due to be

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.