U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2012

United States v. Jon Jerald Hammill

United States v. Jon Jerald Hammill
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided September 7, 2012 · Barkett, Pryor, Hill
489 F. App'x 357

Counsel

Judy K. Hunt, Robert E. O’Neill, Lynn Riedel, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, Glenn Irwin Chernigoff, U.S. Department of Justice-Criminal Division. Henry Parker Van Dyck, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Howard C. Anderson, John Leonard Ba-dalamenti, Rosemary Cakmis, Donna Lee Elm, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Orlando, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.

United States v. Jon Jerald Hammill

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

John Badalamenti, appointed counsel for Jon Hammill in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Hammill’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.