U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2012

United States v. Gaspar Bishop

United States v. Gaspar Bishop
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided September 10, 2012 · Hull, Martin, Hill
489 F. App'x 363

United States v. Gaspar Bishop

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Randolph P. Murrell, appointed counsel for Gaspar Bishop, in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We have reviewed both counsel’s brief and Bishop’s response. Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. *364 Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bishops’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.