United States v. Kier Elgin Riley

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Kier Elgin Riley

Opinion

Case: 12-12890 Date Filed: 11/09/2012 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 12-12890

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:99-cr-00029-MP-AK-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus KIER ELGIN RILEY,

Defendant-Appellant.

__________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Florida

_________________________

(November 9, 2012) Before WILSON, PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Case: 12-12890 Date Filed: 11/09/2012 Page: 2 of 2

Kier Elgin Riley appeals pro se the sua sponte decision of the district court to deny him a sentence reduction. 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). The district court determined that Riley was not entitled to a reduction of his sentence under Amendment 750 of the Sentencing Guidelines. We affirm.

The district court did not err. Amendment 750 did not alter Riley’s sentencing range. Riley was responsible for distributing 34.17 kilograms of crack cocaine and was ineligible for a sentence reduction. United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2D1.1(c)(1). Riley argues that the district court should have considered the sentencing factors, 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), but a district court applies the sentencing factors only when it has the authority to reduce a sentence and decides to grant a reduction.

We AFFIRM the sua sponte decision of the district court to deny Riley a reduction of his sentence.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished