U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2013

United States v. Valentin De La Cruz

United States v. Valentin De La Cruz
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided July 22, 2013 · Tjoflat, Pryor, Hill
523 F. App'x 703

United States v. Valentin De La Cruz

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

George Bedell, appointed counsel for Valentin de la Cruz in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and de la Cruz’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.