Kelly Philips v. M.I. Quality Lawn Maintenance, Inc.
Opinion
This appeal arises from Appellants’ complaint alleging violations of the minimum wage, overtime, and retaliation provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219. On March 30, 2011, the district court granted the Appellees’ motion for partial summary judgment on the minimum wage and retaliation claims, *909 and this appeal followed. 1 After carefully reviewing both parties’ briefs, and with the benefit of oral argument, we affirm the partial grant of summary judgment entered against the Appellants for the reasons set forth in the well-reasoned order entered by the district court on March 30, 2011.
AFFIRMED.
. After the order granting partial summary judgment, a jury returned a verdict for Appellees on Appellant's overtime claims. Although Appellants' Notice of Appeal purports to challenge that verdict, their brief makes no
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Kelly PHILLIPS, Plaintiff-Counter Defendant-Appellant, Luisa Ginsberg, Cristina Paret, Yahilin Chirino, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. M.I. QUALITY LAWN MAINTENANCE, INC., Mitchell’s Lawn Maintenance Corp., Adriana J. Igelko, as Guardian for Mitchell Igelko, Defendants-Counter Claimants-Appellees, Mitchell Igelko, Defendant-Counter Claimant
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Unpublished