Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2013

Kelly Philips v. M.I. Quality Lawn Maintenance, Inc.

Kelly Philips v. M.I. Quality Lawn Maintenance, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided October 18, 2013 · Tjoflat, Wilson, Coogler
537 F. App'x 908

Counsel

Daniel T. Feld, The Law Office of Eddy O. Marban, Coral Gables, FL, Karl David Kelly, Jamie H. Zidell, J.H. Zidell, PA, Miami Beach, FL, for Plaintiff-Counter Defendant-Appellant., Daniel Alberto Espinosa, Robin Felicity Hazel, Espinosa Jomarron, Miami, FL, for Defendants-Counter Claimants-Appellees.

Kelly Philips v. M.I. Quality Lawn Maintenance, Inc.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This appeal arises from Appellants’ complaint alleging violations of the minimum wage, overtime, and retaliation provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219. On March 30, 2011, the district court granted the Appellees’ motion for partial summary judgment on the minimum wage and retaliation claims, *909 and this appeal followed. 1 After carefully reviewing both parties’ briefs, and with the benefit of oral argument, we affirm the partial grant of summary judgment entered against the Appellants for the reasons set forth in the well-reasoned order entered by the district court on March 30, 2011.

AFFIRMED.

1

. After the order granting partial summary judgment, a jury returned a verdict for Appellees on Appellant's overtime claims. Although Appellants' Notice of Appeal purports to challenge that verdict, their brief makes no

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.