United States v. Joseph Domenic Flowers

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Joseph Domenic Flowers

Opinion

Case: 13-10414 Date Filed: 12/13/2013 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

Nos. 13-10414; 13-10420 1

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket Nos. 1:11-cr-00301-WHB-LTW-1,

1:10-cr-00276-WBH-LTW-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSEPH DOMENIC FLOWERS,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

________________________

(December 13, 2013) Before TJOFLAT, JORDAN and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 These cases were consolidated on appeal.

Case: 13-10414 Date Filed: 12/13/2013 Page: 2 of 2

Mary Erickson, counsel for Joseph Flowers, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion is GRANTED, and Flowers’ convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished