United States v. Roderick Monroe

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Roderick Monroe

Opinion

Case: 13-10460 Date Filed: 08/29/2013 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 13-10460

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 6:12-cr-00100-GKS-TBS-3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RODERICK MONROE, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(August 29, 2013) Before CARNES, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT and BARKETT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Charles E. Taylor, appointed counsel for Roderick Monroe in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant

Case: 13-10460 Date Filed: 08/29/2013 Page: 2 of 2 and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel=s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Monroe’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished