U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2013

United States v. Dukes

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided March 15, 2013 · Barkett, Kravitch, Marcus

518 F. App'x 601

Counsel

Peggy Morris Ronca, Robert Edward Bodnar, Jr., U.S. Attorney’s Office, Orlando, FL, Robert E. O’Neill, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Thomas H. Dale, Dale Law Firm, PA, Orlando, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Fox v. The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, LLC (United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida 2022)
Parker v. Healthcare Investment Group, Inc. (United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama 2017)
Lage v. Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC (United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida 2015)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Tom Dale, appointed counsel for Dwight Dukes in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Dukes’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.