Maclin v. Hobbs

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Maclin v. Hobbs, 519 F. App'x 580 (11th Cir. 2013)

Maclin v. Hobbs

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

For the reasons fully discussed at oral argument, we conclude that Plaintiff ad*581duced ample evidence to create genuine issues of fact with respect to both prongs of Plaintiffs claim — both the knowledge prong and the deliberate indifference prong. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is reversed and this case is remanded for trial.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Reference

Full Case Name
T. Mark MACLIN, as Administrator ad Litem of the Estate of David Smith v. Dr. William HOBBS, J. Galbreath, RN, Correctional Medical Services, Inc.
Status
Published