U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2013

United States v. Jorge Alejandro Anaya Medina

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided July 1, 2013 · Wilson, Jordan, Anderson

522 F. App'x 798

Counsel

Michael V. Herskowitz, Garrett L. Bradford, Gary Scott Hulsey, Lawrence R. Sommerfeld, Lisa Wilson Tarvin, George Jeffrey Viscomi, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Sally Yates, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellee., E. Vaughn Dunnigan, E. Vaughn Dunni-gan, PC, Akil Kenneth Secret, The Secret Firm, PC, Amy Levin Weil, The Weil Firm, Atlanta, GA, Jorge Alejandro Ana-ya-Medina, D. Ray James Cf-Inmate Legal Mail, Folkston, GA, for Defendants-Appellants.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

E. Vaughn Dunnigan, appointed counsel for Jorge Alejandro Anaya-Medina, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Anaya-Medina’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.