U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2014

United States v. Anthony Lamar Winston

United States v. Anthony Lamar Winston
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided April 16, 2014 · Hull, Marcus, Per Curiam, Pryor
563 F. App'x 672

United States v. Anthony Lamar Winston

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Goggans, appointed counsel for Anthony Lamar Winston in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Winston’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED. Winston’s motion for appointment of new counsel is DENIED as moot.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.