U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2014

United States v. Abdul Cunningham

United States v. Abdul Cunningham
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided June 25, 2014 · Carnes, Hull, Marcus, Per Curiam
569 F. App'x 914

United States v. Abdul Cunningham

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Tracy N. DaCruz, appointed counsel for Abdul Cunningham in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Cunningham and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. Califor nia, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Cunningham’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.