United States v. Norman v. Charlton
Opinion
Robert Godfrey, appointed counsel for Norman Charlton in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Charlton and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Charlton’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Norman v. CHARLTON, Defendant-Appellant
- Status
- Unpublished