U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2015

United States v. Norman v. Charlton

United States v. Norman v. Charlton
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided March 17, 2015 · Hull, Jordan, Black, Judges'
598 F. App'x 752

United States v. Norman v. Charlton

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Robert Godfrey, appointed counsel for Norman Charlton in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Charlton and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Charlton’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.