United States v. Christopher L. Haley

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Christopher L. Haley

Opinion

Case: 14-14076 Date Filed: 04/22/2015 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 14-14076

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 6:11-cr-00004-BAE-GRS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CHRISTOPHER L. HALEY,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Georgia

________________________

(April 22, 2015) Before JORDAN, ROSENBAUM and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Matthew K. Hube, appointed counsel for Christopher L. Haley in this appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and

Case: 14-14076 Date Filed: 04/22/2015 Page: 2 of 2 filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). In a pro se response to counsel’s motion to withdraw, Haley requests the appointment of substitute counsel and a continuance. Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, Haley’s pro se motion for appointment of substitute counsel and a continuance is DENIED, and the judgment revoking Haley’s supervised release and his resulting sentence are AFFIRMED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished