For the reasons stated in the District Court’s order of July 14, 2014, denying appellant’s motion for relief from judgment under Federal Rules 60(b)(1) and (b)(6), we agree that appellant failed to present an adequate basis for granting relief from the District Court’s judgment due to “(1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect,” or. “(6) any other reason that justifies relief.” We therefore find no abuse of discretion in the denial of appellant’s motion.

AFFIRMED.