Neal Rosensweig, appointed counsel for Ulysses Richman in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record re *414 veals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Richman’s convictions and sentences are

AFFIRMED.

However, we note that there is a clerical error in the judgment. The judgment lists Richman’s statutes of conviction for Count 2 as 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 8419(b)(1)(C). The correct statutes, as reflected in the indictment, are 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(C). Accordingly, the judgment is VACATED and the case is REMANDED for the limited purpose of correcting a clerical error in the judgment. See United States v. Massey, 443 F.3d 814, 822 (11th Cir. 2006).