Western Heritage Insurance Company v. Dennis Mark Montana

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Western Heritage Insurance Company v. Dennis Mark Montana

Opinion

Case: 15-10967 Date Filed: 11/23/2015 Page: 1 of 3

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________

Nos. 14-13542 & 14-13657 ________________________

D.C. Docket No. 8:13-cv-01116-SCB-TGW

WESTERN HERITAGE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Plaintiff - Counter Defendant - Appellee Cross Appellant,

versus

DENNIS MARK MONTANA, a Guardian of Paul N. Blevins, as Assignee of Suncoast Preferred Investment Corp., REBEKAH J. PATTERSON, as Guardian of minor children, D.B., D.B., F.B., as Assignee of Suncoast Preferred Investment Corp.,

Defendants - Counter Claimants – Counter Defendants - Appellants Cross-Appellees.

________________________

Nos. 15-10967 & 15-11166 ________________________

D.C. Docket No. 8:13-cv-01116-SCB-TGW Case: 15-10967 Date Filed: 11/23/2015 Page: 2 of 3

WESTERN HERITAGE INSURANCE COMPANY, an Arizona corporation,

Plaintiff - Counter Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee,

versus

DENNIS MARK MONTANA, as Guardian of Paul N. Blevins, as Assignee of Suncoast Preferred Investment Corp., a Florida citizen, REBEKAH J. PATTERSON, as Guardian of minor children, D.B., D.B., F.B., as Assignee of Suncoast Preferred Investment Corp., a Florida citizen,

Defendants - Counter Claimants – Counter Defendants - Appellees Cross-Appellants.

_______________________

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida ________________________

(November 23, 2015)

Before ROSENBAUM, JULIE CARNES, and DUBINA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

We have before us the related appeals and cross-appeals in an insurance-

coverage dispute between the Western Heritage Insurance Company (“Western

Heritage”) and the guardians of Paul Blevins and Blevins’s children (“Blevins”).

We have carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs, and we have had the 2 Case: 15-10967 Date Filed: 11/23/2015 Page: 3 of 3

benefit of oral argument. We now affirm the district court’s orders in all respects

for the reasons articulated by the district court in its orders.

AFFIRMED.

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished