United States v. Vincent Hudson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Vincent Hudson

Opinion

Case: 14-15480 Date Filed: 12/07/2015 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 14-15480

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 6:14-cr-00078-PGB-TBS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus VINCENT HUDSON, a.k.a. Goldie,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(December 7, 2015) Before TJOFLAT, JULIE CARNES and FAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Case: 14-15480 Date Filed: 12/07/2015 Page: 2 of 2

Thomas Dale, appointed appellate counsel for Vincent Hudson, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Hudson’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished