United States v. Eugene Antonio Govan

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Eugene Antonio Govan

Opinion

Case: 15-11140 Date Filed: 12/09/2015 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 15-11140

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 6:14-cr-00119-RDB-DAB-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus EUGENE ANTONIO GOVAN,

Defendant - Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(December 9, 2015) Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JILL PRYOR and FAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Tom Dale, appointed counsel for Eugene Govan in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Mr. Govan and

Case: 15-11140 Date Filed: 12/09/2015 Page: 2 of 2 prepared a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Mr. Govan’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED. Because the final judgment incorrectly listed the offense of conviction as 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1), 924(e)(4)—and because § 924 subsection (e)(4) does not exist—we VACATE and REMAND for the limited purpose of correcting this clerical error.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished