U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2016

NJN Systems, Inc. v. Sunoco, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided April 5, 2016 · Hull, Carnes, Clevenger

646 F. App'x 915

Counsel

Elizabeth Cangelose Wheeler, Elizabeth C. "Wheeler, PA, Orlando, FL, Kurt Edward Alexander, Rigdon Alexander & Rig-don, LLP, Merritt Island, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellant., Arthur Christopher Young, Allison Elaine Delaurentis, Pepper Hamilton, LLP, Philadelphia, PA, Alan J. Lander-man, Richard Barry Schwamm, Haliczer Pettis & Schwamm, PA, Orlando, FL, for Defendant-Appellee.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The parties here are already familiar with the facts and procedural history. Both parties presented their claims and defenses based on lay witness testimony. No party objected to the lack of expert testimony in the district court or on appeal. Thus, we decide the case based on how the parties litigated it. See Marsh v. Butler Cty., 268 F.3d 1014, 1023-24 n. 4 (11th Cir. 2001) (en banc).

That said, after review of the parties’ briefs and the record, and with the benefit of oral argument, we find no reversible error in the district court’s order granting summary judgement in favor of Defendant Sunoco, Inc. on all of Plaintiff NJN Systems Inc.’s claims, and that order is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.