U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2016

United States v. Justin Trujillo

United States v. Justin Trujillo
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided April 11, 2016 · Martin, Carnes, Anderson
647 F. App'x 941

United States v. Justin Trujillo

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Rachel R. Seaton, appointed counsel for Justin Trujillo in this direct criminal ap *942 peal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Trujillo’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.