After review of the record and the parties’ briefs, and with the benefit of oral argument, we find no reversible error in the district court’s February 18, 2015 order denying plaintiff Louvon Burroughs’s motion for a preliminary injunction and dismissing Burroughs’s first amended complaint with prejudice. We find that Burroughs has likely waived her principal arguments on appeal because they either were not raised in the district court or are materially different from the arguments she raised in the district court. In any event, we conclude that Burroughs’s constitutional facial challenge to the “cyber-stalking provision” of Florida’s stalking statute, Fla. Stat. § 784.048, fails based on the particular record in this case and the limited nature of the arguments, on appeal.

AFFIRMED.