Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 1 of 30

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 16-13528-J, 16-13804-J, & 16-13857-J ________________________

IN RE: LARRY LEONARD,

Petitioner.

__________________________

Application for Leave to File a Second or Successive Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence, 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h) _________________________

Before: MARCUS, MARTIN, and JORDAN, Circuit Judges

B Y T H E P A N E L:

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2255(h) and 2244(b)(3)(A), Larry Leonard has filed an

application seeking an order authorizing the district court to consider a second or successive

motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his federal sentence, 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Such authorization

may be granted only if this Court certifies that the second or successive motion contains a claim

involving:

(1) newly discovered evidence that, if proven and viewed in light of the evidence as a whole, would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that no reasonable factfinder would have found the movant guilty of the offense; or

(2) a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to cases on collateral review by the Supreme Court, that was previously unavailable.

28 U.S.C. § 2255(h). “The court of appeals may authorize the filing of a second or successive

application only if it determines that the application makes a prima facie showing that the Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 2 of 30 Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 3 of 30 Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 4 of 30 Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 5 of 30 Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 6 of 30 Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 7 of 30 Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 8 of 30 Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 9 of 30 Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 10 of 30 Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 11 of 30 Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 12 of 30 Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 13 of 30 Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 14 of 30 Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 15 of 30 Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 16 of 30 Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 17 of 30 Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 18 of 30 Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 19 of 30 Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 20 of 30 Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 21 of 30 Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 22 of 30 Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 23 of 30 Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 24 of 30 Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 25 of 30 Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 26 of 30 Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 27 of 30 Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 28 of 30 Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 29 of 30 Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 30 of 30