United States v. Mohammed Bah

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Mohammed Bah

Opinion

Case: 15-13271 Date Filed: 08/29/2016 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 15-13271

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cr-00098-RWS-RGV-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MOHAMMED BAH, a.k.a. Little,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

________________________

(August 29, 2016) Before TJOFLAT, MARCUS and WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Case: 15-13271 Date Filed: 08/29/2016 Page: 2 of 2

Michael J. Trost, appointed counsel for Mohammed Bah in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bah’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED. Bah’s motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED AS MOOT.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished