United States v. Mohammed Bah
United States v. Mohammed Bah
Opinion
Case: 15-13271 Date Filed: 08/29/2016 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 15-13271
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cr-00098-RWS-RGV-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus MOHAMMED BAH, a.k.a. Little,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia
________________________
(August 29, 2016) Before TJOFLAT, MARCUS and WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
Case: 15-13271 Date Filed: 08/29/2016 Page: 2 of 2
Michael J. Trost, appointed counsel for Mohammed Bah in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bah’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED. Bah’s motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED AS MOOT.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished