United States v. Thomas Jerome Lundy

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Thomas Jerome Lundy

Opinion

Case: 16-10140 Date Filed: 08/31/2016 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 16-10140

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:02-cr-00043-MP-GRJ-4 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus THOMAS JEROME LUNDY,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Florida

________________________

(August 31, 2016) Before WILSON, ROSENBAUM and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Case: 16-10140 Date Filed: 08/31/2016 Page: 2 of 2

Richard M. Summa, appointed counsel for Thomas Jerome Lundy in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel=s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Lundy’s conviction and sentence is AFFIRMED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished